Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more.
Moving pets and people are still the Galaxy S24 Ultra camera's kryptonite đź
There are many great camera phones nowadays and any modern smartphone will often get you a good photo thatâs miles ahead of anything we were able to achieve a few years ago. But add a moving subject there â say a jumping child or a fussy pet â and youâre likely to run into some problems.
Samsung phones are famous for missing the mark on more than one occasion in these situations, so I was curious to know how the Galaxy S24 Ultra would perform. Did Samsung fix its notorious shutter lag and motion blur when snapping photos of moving subjects, or did it rest on its laurels, knowing it doesnât have any real competition for its S Pen-touting flagship?
Since I canât (and wonât) share pics of kids, I went for the next best test subject: cats. I tried my Galaxy S24 Ultra and my Google Pixel 8 Pro â the most reliable camera Iâve used â on two adorable furry friends. Here are my findings.
Since I was shooting with both phones at the very same instant, the pics aren't 100% aligned. I was holding each phone with one hand, right next to each other, so there's a lot of overlap between them, but one captures more of the scene towards the right and the other to the left. I kept alternating the phones between left and right (my dominant hand) to avoid giving one phone an advantage over the other.
The Galaxy S24 Ultraâs camera is good when your pet is still
Letâs start with the positives first. As long as the fluffy mischief-makers were staying still, the Galaxy S24 Ultraâs camera did very well. I can nitpick the details for hours on end (the colors of the S24 Ultra are more vibrant, but thereâs some extra sharpening and the Pixelâs photos look a bit more natural), but most of that is irrelevant in everyday use. Would I be happy with any of these photos? Yes. Case closed.
⌠but not so great when it moves, even a little bit
Everything changed when the two kittens started moving. Just a fraction of a movement and the Galaxy S24 Ultra rendered a blurry pic. The sad part is that I would think, âOh, I snapped that right on time,â only for me to notice that the image wasnât as good as Iâd hoped. I tried it with the regular lens, the 5x tele lens, and the 3x portrait lens, and it happened with all of them.
When motion is detected, the Pixel camera cuts its shutter speed in half, but the Galaxy S24 Ultra doesn't.
I was curious to know if shutter speed was to blame and, sure enough, in most cases, the Pixel was twice as fast as the Galaxy. You can see the shutter speeds of every photo below between parentheses. Compared to similar photos taken a second earlier with an immobile cat, Samsung doesnât seem to be changing its shutter speed when motion is detected, whereas the Pixel cuts its shutter speed by half to adapt. By not going for a faster snap, Samsung captures more motion when the subject is moving, hence the blur.
This, along with the Pixel seriesâ Face Unblur (which now works for pets too), makes the Pixel a superior camera experience for those who like snapping pics of people, pets, and kids. In comparison, the unreliability of Samsungâs camera is staggering. How can the leading Android brand in the world offer such an abysmal camera experience for the people and animals we love the most is beyond me.
I wouldn't get a Samsung phone if I cared a lot about pet and people photography.
For scientific purposes, Iâll be testing manual capture on the S24 Ultra in the future, to see if a faster capture will fix the blur issue (it should), but letâs be realistic: No one will ever think of manually setting their shutter speed on their phone. Especially not when taking pics of subjects in motion, which is the very situation where you need to be as quick as possible with your snapping. The only time it makes sense to set it manually is if you were doing a proper photo shoot session with your kid or pet and you know youâll keep the same speed for a while. Otherwise, thatâs impossible for spur-of-the-moment snaps.
3x tele portraits are fantastic, most of the time
Besides the shutter blur, I was quite curious about the benefit of a proper portrait lens. The Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts two telephoto lenses â the big 5x 50MP and the smaller 3x 10MP. Itâs the first time I have a phone with two optical zoom options, and since I think the main camera on phones is too wide these days and I often zoom to 2x/3x in my photos, I wanted to see how useful the standalone 3x lens would be.
The answer is: Very. Portrait shots taken with the 3x lens are great. Check the beauty shots below.
From literally the same distance, this is what you get when you use the S24 Ultraâs portrait mode on the 3x tele lens compared to the 2x cropped (from the main 1x lens) portrait pic of the Pixel 8 Pro. Samsungâs 3x lens lets you get closer to the subject without losing any detail in cropping, and most importantly, it offers the focal length (and distortion) of a proper tele lens.
One issue I did come across, though, is with Samsung failing to properly identify the subject of the portrait and blurring the catâs face while keeping its body and back in focus. Youâll have to click on the samples below to properly spot the difference.
In some tougher portraits, Samsung chose to take focus away from the cat's face.
Sure, I can manually change the focus point and fix the photo, but not everyone will know they can do that. More importantly, it takes time to fix these photos. Samsung should improve its detection to focus on the most important part of the portrait.
Overall, I think the results leave me quite mitigated. When the Galaxy S24 Ultraâs camera works properly for living subjects, itâs great. It takes captivating snaps that are perfect for social media and viewing on your phoneâs display. Plus, personally, my ideal photos would have the soft focus of the Pixel 8 Proâs shots with a color profile somewhere in the middle between the Pixelâs very natural and muted colors and Samsungâs more saturated and vivid colors.
An unreliable camera is the worst camera.
But Iâm worried about those scenarios where the S24 Ultra fails. I wouldnât want this as my only camera when taking photos of pets and people because I canât always expect them to stand still. And because I definitely do want to snap candid mid-motion photos of my husband doing silly facial expressions, my friendâs dog smiling, or my neighborâs cat showing its teeth. If 20-30% of those photos turn out blurry, thatâd be disheartening, and thatâs my issue with the S24 Ultra. An unreliable camera is the worst camera.
What do you think of the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultraâs performance with pets and moving subjects? Let me know in the poll and the comments below.